Seems it's easier to make the case that the federal law is too lenient, rather than too harsh. (New York, according to the charts, boasts that 80% of its students are a bunch of brainiacs under the law - yet even NYSUT, CFE, and the smaller class size advocates argue that our state's schools are so awful that we need billions and billions of dollars more to fix things. The point: people on every side of the issue understand that there are lots more than 20% of the state's kids who are getting screwed under the present system.)
Doesn't it suggest that New York may be gaming the system? So what is everyone afraid of with all this NCLB stuff anyway? Does anyone remember the last time (other than charter schools that were closed as part of built-in accountability systems in the state's charter school law) that any grownup actually suffered because their school sucked? That's not the way we do things. If you fail, you get more cash. NCLB, the way it is currently enforced, will not change that. Fear not, New Yorkers!
Disclaimer: The Chalkboard is hosted by the New York Charter Schools Association (NYCSA) as a place where members, public education advocates and others can view and respond to informed commentary on timely public education and charter school issues. The views expressed here are not necessarily the official views of the NYCSA, its board, or of any of its individual charter school members. Anyone who claims otherwise is violating the spirit and purpose of this blog. To comment on anything you read here, or to offer tips, advice, comments, or complaints. please contact TheChalkboard.