Friday, January 15, 2010

 
The Energizer Debate: SUNY's Role in Chartering

The State University of New York's role in charter authorizing should not be a subject of debate with the state negotiating a Race to the Top bill to include a charter cap lift. But it is, and represents a giant distraction from where legislators should be focused.

SUNY is a high-quality authorizer, and among the best in the country. That's the view of the U.S. Department of Education and national charter organizations.

Extrapolating from the just-released CREDO study from Stanford University shows that of the New York City charter schools it examined, the SUNY-approved charters outperformed other charter schools.

Eliminating SUNY's charter role means fewer charter school opportunities and lower quality public schools for families, especially in areas of need. Two statewide chartering entities are better than one (see here). There is no valid academic or public policy reason to eliminate SUNY. This is a purely political argument.

Political Rather Than Educational Debate
The SUNY issue dates back to the late 1990's when the Charter Schools Act was first debated in New York. The SUNY Board of Trustees are all appointees of the Governor, subject to approval by the Senate. The Governor also designates the SUNY chairman. By contrast, the Regents are appointed by the Legislature -- meaning the Assembly Majority, which is by far the largest caucus.

It stands to reason that any Governor, regardless of political party, would want the ability to influence chartering under a state charter law. That's why Gov. Pataki insisted that SUNY be given such a role, and that's why Gov. Spitzer rebuffed the Assembly's effort in 2007 to eliminate SUNY chartering. At his meeting today with legislative leaders, Gov. Paterson showed the same unwillingness to tamper with SUNY's chartering role.

The problem the Assembly has with SUNY's role is that it has less influence than it does with the Regents. For example, SUNY has approved some charters that are upsetting some members of the Assembly. The Senate should not be playing along with this dance since it approves SUNY trustees, not the Assembly.

It's Settled Law - Move On
Let's stop arguing policy debates from the last century. The Assembly should drop its 12-year effort to remove SUNY from its charter role, and move on from this power play. There are more important matters, like ensuring another $700 million for New York's fiscal plan.

Peter Murphy
for The Chalkboard
 

Disclaimer: The Chalkboard is hosted by the New York Charter Schools Association (NYCSA) as a place where members, public education advocates and others can view and respond to informed commentary on timely public education and charter school issues. The views expressed here are not necessarily the official views of the NYCSA, its board, or of any of its individual charter school members. Anyone who claims otherwise is violating the spirit and purpose of this blog. To comment on anything you read here, or to offer tips, advice, comments, or complaints. please contact TheChalkboard.