Thursday, January 21, 2010
Teacher Unions Got Their Way: No Reform; No Charter Cap Lift
President Obama called on states to "lift charter caps" which he set forth as one of several criteria in his Race to the Top program. With New York bumping up against its charter cap in 2010, it's common sense for New York to oblige the President, and get additional funding for doing so. Many other states saw it the same way.
It was not to be in New York.
At a Sunday afternoon press conference, January 3rd, the United Federation of Teachers unveiled a charter "hit-list" (my words) of detrimental policies it wanted to accompany any cap lift. Without question, adoption of any number of these policies, including eliminating SUNY, imposing higher building costs, and others, would turn back the clock on chartering by neutering New York's charter school law. In other words, the teachers unions' agenda was to make any provision to lift the cap unworkable.
That's not what the President had in mind.
Teacher Union Heads Hurt NYS Chances for RttT $
The UFT and its state parent, the New York State United Teachers, got the legislative majorities to introduce a bill to pretend to lift the charter cap while simultaneously fulfilling their agenda of shackling charter schools beyond recognition, this time in stealthy fashion. Why else would they support this bill? By contrast, the unions wanted no part of Gov. Paterson's clean cap lift bill.
The union leaders blameshifting logic denies the reality of their own culpability in this fiasco of failing to strengthen New York's competitive chances for Race to the Top. But charter advocates must press on and make the case for the quality and success charters have been for children and the need for more, as the Daily News reports today.
If New York State loses out on a federal Race to the Top grant because 8 percent of the points fell away by its inhibiting charter schools, we can "thank" UFT and NYSUT, who will have ultimately denied their own membership these funds flowing to their schools. How can I be so sure? NYSUT's head, Richard Iannuzzi made this all too clear when he called the charter cap a "bogus issue with respect to Race to the Top."
The unions' behavior throughout the month made abundantly clear that having more, effective charter schools from a unhindered cap lift and other education reforms and accountability wasn't worth up to $700 million in new federal education funds.
Peter Murphy
for The Chalkboard
It was not to be in New York.
At a Sunday afternoon press conference, January 3rd, the United Federation of Teachers unveiled a charter "hit-list" (my words) of detrimental policies it wanted to accompany any cap lift. Without question, adoption of any number of these policies, including eliminating SUNY, imposing higher building costs, and others, would turn back the clock on chartering by neutering New York's charter school law. In other words, the teachers unions' agenda was to make any provision to lift the cap unworkable.
That's not what the President had in mind.
Teacher Union Heads Hurt NYS Chances for RttT $
The UFT and its state parent, the New York State United Teachers, got the legislative majorities to introduce a bill to pretend to lift the charter cap while simultaneously fulfilling their agenda of shackling charter schools beyond recognition, this time in stealthy fashion. Why else would they support this bill? By contrast, the unions wanted no part of Gov. Paterson's clean cap lift bill.
The union leaders blameshifting logic denies the reality of their own culpability in this fiasco of failing to strengthen New York's competitive chances for Race to the Top. But charter advocates must press on and make the case for the quality and success charters have been for children and the need for more, as the Daily News reports today.
If New York State loses out on a federal Race to the Top grant because 8 percent of the points fell away by its inhibiting charter schools, we can "thank" UFT and NYSUT, who will have ultimately denied their own membership these funds flowing to their schools. How can I be so sure? NYSUT's head, Richard Iannuzzi made this all too clear when he called the charter cap a "bogus issue with respect to Race to the Top."
The unions' behavior throughout the month made abundantly clear that having more, effective charter schools from a unhindered cap lift and other education reforms and accountability wasn't worth up to $700 million in new federal education funds.
Peter Murphy
for The Chalkboard
Disclaimer: The Chalkboard is hosted by the New York Charter Schools Association (NYCSA) as a place where members, public education advocates and others can view and respond to informed commentary on timely public education and charter school issues. The views expressed here are not necessarily the official views of the NYCSA, its board, or of any of its individual charter school members. Anyone who claims otherwise is violating the spirit and purpose of this blog. To comment on anything you read here, or to offer tips, advice, comments, or complaints. please contact TheChalkboard.



